{"id":3372,"date":"2023-10-11T09:41:59","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T07:41:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/?p=3372"},"modified":"2023-10-11T09:41:59","modified_gmt":"2023-10-11T07:41:59","slug":"cfp-colloque-pas-de-reconciliation-sans-decolonisation-poitiers-mars-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/cfp\/cfp-colloque-pas-de-reconciliation-sans-decolonisation-poitiers-mars-2024\/3372\/","title":{"rendered":"CFP Colloque \u00ab\u00a0Pas de (r\u00e9)conciliation sans d\u00e9colonisation ?\u00a0\u00bb, Poitiers, mars 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"

Colloque international
\nPas de (r\u00e9)conciliation sans d\u00e9colonisation ?<\/strong>
\nDialogue(s) et dissonance(s) entre communaut\u00e9s autochtones,<\/strong>
\nallochtones et autorit\u00e9s publiques en Am\u00e9rique du Nord<\/strong><\/p>\n

Universit\u00e9 de Poitiers, 7, 8 et 9 Mars 2024<\/p>\n

Organis\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Poitiers par le MIMMOC, en partenariat avec :
\n– \u00c0 l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Poitiers : l\u2019IEAQ, la chaire de recherche Senghor sur la francophonie, la MSHS et le festival Bruits de Langues ;
\n– Sur le plan r\u00e9gional : la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration pour l’\u00e9tude des civilisations contemporaines (FE2C) : D2iA La Rochelle, R\u00e9m\u00e9lice Orl\u00e9ans et EHIC Limoges ;
\n– \u00c0 l\u2019international : le Centre interuniversitaire d’\u00e9tudes et de recherches autochtones CI\u00c9RA-MTL de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al.<\/p>\n

Appel \u00e0 communication (English version available below)<\/p>\n

Malgr\u00e9 un processus dit de r\u00e9conciliation initi\u00e9 en 2008 au Canada (Commission V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et R\u00e9conciliation), le dialogue entre populations autochtones, allochtones et autorit\u00e9s publiques au Canada et aux \u00c9tats-Unis, quand il est amorc\u00e9, semble souvent se heurter \u00e0 des obstacles. Si certains sont \u00e9vidents, tels que la discrimination syst\u00e9mique qui perdure envers les Autochtones, d\u2019autres le sont moins, et d\u00e9coulent par exemple des difficult\u00e9s \u00e0 exposer et assumer la m\u00e9moire des crimes pass\u00e9s (Madley) ou de l\u2019\u00e9loignement entre les diff\u00e9rents acteurs en question, produit du colonialisme. Parfois, il s\u2019agit encore d\u2019un manque de connaissance \u00ab patent \u00bb (Bousquet). Face \u00e0 ce constat, ce colloque se donne pour but de chercher \u00e0 cerner ce qui demeure de l\u2019ordre du colonialisme, du n\u00e9o-colonialisme, de la colonialit\u00e9(Escobar), des impasses du post-colonialisme \u2013 autant de concepts essentiels qu\u2019il s\u2019agira d\u2019explorer. En somme, l\u2019objectif est d\u2019\u00e9tudier ce qui emp\u00eache encore, souvent, une relation \u00ab \u00e9quitable et inclusive \u00bb (Principes de r\u00e9conciliation, CVRC) entre populations autochtones et allochtones.<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019est-ce qui perdure des pratiques coloniales, structurellement ou syst\u00e9miquementdans le r\u00e9cit historique, les politiques publiques, les m\u00e9moires collectives et les repr\u00e9sentations ? Quelles sont les forces de transformation de ces processus \u00ab encore \u00bb coloniaux, actives aux \u00e9chelles locales, des \u00c9tats ou provinces, nationales, mais aussi inter et transnationales ? Quelles sont les voix qui, dans les mouvements sociaux, politiques, litt\u00e9raires, philosophiques, artistiques proposent un renversement, un renouvellement du rapport au pass\u00e9 et la possibilit\u00e9 d\u2019alt\u00e9rit\u00e9s constructives ? En quoi cette dynamique de d\u00e9colonisation pourrait-elle \u00eatre b\u00e9n\u00e9fique aux populations autochtones, et permettre d\u2019envisager une coexistence collaborative lib\u00e9r\u00e9e du poids et des entraves du pass\u00e9 ?<\/p>\n

Ce colloque pluridisciplinaire tentera de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 certaines de ces questions en explorant, parmi d\u2019autres, les axes de r\u00e9flexion suivants :
\n\u00fc les effets du colonialisme et du n\u00e9o-colonialisme sur la situation actuelle des populations autochtones d\u2019Am\u00e9rique du Nord, et sur les relations entre les populations autochtones et les autres ; une r\u00e9flexion sur la notion de colonialit\u00e9 (Escobar) ;
\n\u00fc l\u2019impact, sur la situation actuelle, de la (non) reconnaissance et la (non) m\u00e9morialisation des politiques discriminatoires et\/ou g\u00e9nocidaires, subies par les populations autochtones d\u2019Am\u00e9rique du Nord, politiques souvent tout simplement tues par les autorit\u00e9s (Dunbar-Ortiz) ;
\n\u00fc l\u2019\u00e9tat des r\u00e9flexions et discussions sur la r\u00e9paration des crimes pass\u00e9s \u00e0 de multiples \u00e9chelles, entre le local, le national et le transnational, entre histoire particuli\u00e8re et histoire collective (Bousquet)
\n\u00fc des r\u00e9flexions autour des notions de ruptures et\/ou de continuit\u00e9, de fixit\u00e9 (Bhabha) et de progr\u00e8s, de temporalit\u00e9 et d\u2019atemporalit\u00e9 (Fabian), qui remettraient en question la vision lin\u00e9aire de l\u2019histoire de la colonisation, des relations entre autochtones et allochtones, de l\u2019action et de l\u2019inaction, du visible et de l\u2019invisible, des dites \u00ab ruptures \u00bb dans les pratiques coloniales ou post-coloniales ou encore les repr\u00e9sentations des actions de r\u00e9sistances autochtones ;
\n\u00fc les notions de collaboration, de co-cr\u00e9ation et de co-r\u00e9sistance dans la lutte pour la d\u00e9colonisation et pour l\u2019autochtonisation, mais aussi le d\u00e9centrement et l\u2019humilit\u00e9 culturelle, l\u2019int\u00e9gration des savoirs et perspectives autochtones, ainsi que l\u2019inclusion d\u2019une vision holistique et d\u2019une approche relationnelle dans le rapport \u00e0 l\u2019individu et au groupe ;
\n\u00fc la d\u00e9colonisation des \u00e9pist\u00e9mologies en vue de la d\u00e9construction des concepts normatifs occidentaux, de terminologies (\u00ab d\u00e9couverte \u00bb, \u00ab progr\u00e8s \u00bb, \u00ab universalisme \u00bb) et de la repr\u00e9sentation de l\u2019alt\u00e9rit\u00e9, notamment par l\u2019apprentissage des langues autochtones, la traduction des \u0153uvres autochtones et l\u2019utilisation de cadres m\u00e9thodologiques et th\u00e9oriques autochtones (Battiste) ;
\n\u00fc envisager la \u00ab structure coloniale \u00bb (Wolfe) dans son ensemble, les liens, les r\u00e9seaux, ramifications et espaces interconnect\u00e9s qui entravent le processus de d\u00e9colonisation ;
\n\u00fc le lien intime entre territoire et (d\u00e9)colonisation : le territoire, la fronti\u00e8re, la territorialisation et la d\u00e9territorialisation (Rifkin) ;
\n\u00fc le r\u00f4le de l\u2019art, de la com\u00e9die, de l\u2019humour, de la litt\u00e9rature dans le processus de rencontre interculturelle et de co-cr\u00e9ation (Wagamese, King, Th\u00e9\u00e2tre Menuentakuan).<\/p>\n

Les propositions de communication peuvent \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es en anglais ou en fran\u00e7ais. Merci de faire parvenir le titre et le r\u00e9sum\u00e9 de votre communication (250-300 mots), ainsi qu\u2019une courte bio-bibliographie, au comit\u00e9 d\u2019organisation avant le 15 d\u00e9cembre 2023. Les coll\u00e8gues seront notifi\u00e9s de l\u2019acceptation ou non de leur proposition \u00e0 la mi-janvier 2024.
\nUne publication d\u00e9coulera des travaux du colloque.<\/p>\n

Comit\u00e9 organisateur :<\/strong>
\nKelly Fazilleau : kelly.fazilleau
\nAndr\u00e9 Magord : andre.magord
\nJulien Zarifian : julien.zarifian
\nEn collaboration<\/strong> avec Marie-Pierre Bousquet, Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al et le CI\u00c9RA-MTL<\/p>\n

Bibliographie:<\/strong>
\nAshcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures<\/em>. London: Routledge, 1989.
\nBarnd, Natchee Blu. Native Space: Geographic Strategies to Unsettle Settler Colonialism<\/em>. Corvallis : Oregon State University Press, 2017
\nBattiste, Marie. \u201cDecolonizing the University: Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Indigenous Populations\u201d. Findlay LM, Bidwell PM (eds) Pursuing Academic Freedom: \u201cFree and Fearless\u201d?<\/em> Saskatoon, SK: Purich Press, 2001, p. 190\u2013203.
\nBhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture<\/em>. 1994. London: Routledge, 2004.
\nBousquet, Marie-Pierre. \u00ab La constitution de la m\u00e9moire des pensionnats indiens au Qu\u00e9bec : Drame collectif autochtone ou histoire commune ? \u00bb. Recherches am\u00e9rindiennes au Qu\u00e9bec, 46(2-3), 2016, p. 165\u2013176.
\nCommission de V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de R\u00e9conciliation au Canada. Appels \u00e0 l\u2019action. <\/em>2012, version \u00e9lectronique, site web : www.trc.ca<\/a><\/p>\n

Commission de V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de R\u00e9conciliation au Canada. Ce que nous avons retenu : Les principes de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de la r\u00e9conciliation<\/em>. 2015, version \u00e9lectronique, site web : www.trc.ca<\/a><\/p>\n

Coulthard, Glen. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition<\/em>. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
\nDunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne. An Indigenous People\u2019s History of the United States<\/em>, Beacon Press, Boston, 2014.
\nEscobar, Arturo, et Retrepo Eduardo. \u00ab Anthropologies h\u00e9g\u00e9moniques et colonialit\u00e9 \u00bb, Cahiers des Am\u00e9riques latines<\/em>, n\u00b0 62, 2009, p.83-95.
\nFabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object<\/em>. New York: Columbia UP, 2014.
\nGaudry, Adam, and Lorenz, Danielle. \u00ab Indigenization as inclusion, reconciliation, and decolonization: navigating the different visions for indigenizing the Canadian Academy \u00bb. AlterNative<\/em>, 14(3), 2018, p. 218-227.
\nKing, Thomas. The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America<\/em>. Anchor Canada, 2013.
\nLonetree, Amy. Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums<\/em>. Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina Press, 2012.
\nLoomba, Ania. Colonialism\/Postcolonialism<\/em>. 1998. London: Routledge (2nd ed.), 2005.
\nMadley, Benjamin. \u201cReexamining the American Genocide Debate: Meaning, Historiography, and New Methods\u201d, The American Historical Review<\/em>, vol. 120, n\u00b0 1, 2015, p. 98-139.
\nMenc\u00e9-Caster, Corinne, et C\u00e9cile Bertin-Elisabeth. \u00ab Approches de la pens\u00e9e d\u00e9coloniale \u00bb. Archip\u00e9lies<\/em>, 2018.
\nRifkin, Mark. \u00ab Settler Common Sense \u00bb. Settler Colonial Studies<\/em>, vol. 3, n\u00b0 3\u20134, 2013, p. 322\u201340.
\nSmith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies Research and Indigenous Peoples<\/em> [1999]. Londres : Zed Books, 2012 [2e<\/sup> \u00e9d.].
\nWagamese, Richard. Indian Horse.<\/em> Douglas & McIntyre, 2012.
\nWolfe, Patrick. \u201cSettler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native\u201d. Journal of Genocide Research<\/em>, vol. 8, n\u00b0 4, 2006, p. 387-409.<\/p>\n

International Conference
\nNo (re)conciliation without decolonization? Dialogue(s) and dissonance(s) between indigenous communities, non-indigenous communities, and public authorities in North America<\/strong><\/p>\n

University of Poitiers, France, March 7, 8, and 9, 2024<\/p>\n

Organized at the University of Poitiers by the MIMMOC, in partnership with:
\n– At the University of Poitiers: the IEAQ, the Senghor Research Chair in Francophonie, the MSHS and the festival Bruits de Langues;
\n– Regionally: the F\u00e9d\u00e9ration pour l’\u00e9tude des civilisations contemporaines (FE2C): the D2iA La Rochelle, R\u00e9m\u00e9lice Orl\u00e9ans and EHIC Limoges;
\n– Internationally: the Centre interuniversitaire d’\u00e9tudes et de recherches autochtones (CI\u00c9RA-MTL) at the University of Montr\u00e9al.<\/p>\n

Despite a so-called reconciliation process initiated in 2008 in Canada (Truth and Reconciliation Commission), the dialogue between indigenous and non-indigenous populations and public authorities in Canada and the United States, when it is initiated, often seems to encounter significant obstacles. While some are obvious, such as the systemic discrimination that persists against Aboriginal people, others are less so, and stem, for example, from the difficulties in exposing and coming to terms with the memory of past crimes (Madley) or the estrangement between the various actors in play, caused by colonialism. Sometimes, it is still a matter of a \u201cpatent\u201d lack of knowledge (Bousquet). In light of these observations, this conference aims to seek to identify the lingering legacy of colonialism, neo-colonialism, coloniality (Escobar), the impasses of post-colonialism \u2013 all essential concepts that will to be explored. In short, the objective is to study what still often stands in the way of a \u201cfair and inclusive\u201d relationship (Principles of Reconciliation, Truth and Reconciliation Commission) between indigenous and non-indigenous populations.<\/p>\n

What then persists in terms of colonial practices, structurally or systemically in the historical narrative, public policies, collective memories and representations? What are the forces of transformation of these \u201ccurrent\u201d colonial processes, active at the local, state or provincial, national, but also inter- and transnational levels? What are the voices which, in social, political, literary, philosophical and artistic movements, propose a reversal, a renewal of the relationship with the past, and the possibility of constructive otherness? How could this dynamic of decolonization be beneficial to indigenous populations, and facilitate a collaborative coexistence freed from the weight and shackles of the past?<\/p>\n

This multidisciplinary symposium will attempt to answer some of these questions by exploring, among others, the following lines of inquiry:
\n\u00fc the effects of colonialism and neo-colonialism on the current situation of indigenous peoples in North America, and on the relationships between indigenous peoples and others; a reflection on the notion of coloniality (Escobar);
\n\u00fc the impact, on the current situation, of the (non) recognition and (non) memorialization of discriminatory and\/or genocidal policies imposed upon the indigenous populations of North America, policies that are often simply omitted by the authorities (Dunbar-Ortiz);
\n\u00fc the current state of reflections and discussions on the reparation of past crimes at multiple scales, between the local, the national and the transnational, between particular history and collective history (Bousquet).
\n\u00fc the discussions pertaining to the notions of breaks and\/or continuity, fixity (Bhabha) and progress, temporality and atemporality (Fabian), which would call into question the linear vision of the history of colonization, of relationships between natives and non-natives, action and inaction, the visible and the invisible, so-called \u201cbreaks\u201d in colonial or post-colonial practices or even representations of native acts of resistance;
\n\u00fc the notions of collaboration, co-creation and co-resistance in the struggle for decolonization and indigenization, but also cultural decentering and humility, the integration of indigenous knowledge and perspectives, as well as the inclusion of a holistic perspective and a relational approach in the relationship with the individual and the group;
\n\u00fc the decolonization of epistemologies in order to deconstruct Western normative concepts, terminologies (\u201cdiscovery\u201d, \u201cprogress\u201d, \u201cuniversalism\u201d) and the representation of otherness, in particular through the learning of indigenous languages, translation of indigenous works and the use of indigenous methodological and theoretical frameworks (Battiste);
\n\u00fc to consider the \u201ccolonial structure\u201d (Wolfe) as a whole, the links, networks, ramifications and interconnected spaces that hinder the process of decolonization;
\n\u00fc the intimate link between territory and (de)colonization: the territory, the border, territorialization and deterritorialization (Rifkin);
\n\u00fc the role of art, comedy, humour, literature in the process of intercultural interaction and co-creation (Wagamese, King, Menuentakuan Theatre).<\/p>\n

Proposals for papers may be submitted in English or French. Please send the title and abstract of your paper (250-300 words), together with a short bio-bibliography, to the organizing committee by December 15th, 2023. Colleagues will be notified whether or not their proposal has been accepted by mid-January 2024.
\nA publication will result from the conference.<\/p>\n

Organizing committee:<\/strong>
\nKelly Fazilleau : kelly.fazilleau
\nAndr\u00e9 Magord : andre.magord
\nJulien Zarifian : julien.zarifian
\nIn collaboration<\/strong> with Marie-Pierre Bousquet, University of Montr\u00e9al and the CI\u00c9RA-MTL<\/p>\n

Bibliography:<\/strong>
\nAshcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures<\/em>. London: Routledge, 1989.
\nBarnd, Natchee Blu. Native Space: Geographic Strategies to Unsettle Settler Colonialism<\/em>. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2017
\nBattiste, Marie. \u201cDecolonizing the University: Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Indigenous Populations\u201d. Findlay LM, Bidwell PM (eds) Pursuing Academic Freedom: \u201cFree and Fearless\u201d?<\/em> Saskatoon, SK: Purich Press, 2001, p. 190\u2013203.
\nBhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture<\/em>. 1994. London: Routledge, 2004.
\nBousquet, Marie-Pierre. \u00ab La constitution de la m\u00e9moire des pensionnats indiens au Qu\u00e9bec : Drame collectif autochtone ou histoire commune ? \u00bb. Recherches am\u00e9rindiennes au Qu\u00e9bec, 46(2-3), 2016, p. 165\u2013176.
\nCommission de V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de R\u00e9conciliation au Canada. Appels \u00e0 l\u2019action. <\/em>2012, version \u00e9lectronique, site web : www.trc.ca<\/a><\/p>\n

Commission de V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de R\u00e9conciliation au Canada. Ce que nous avons retenu : Les principes de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 et de la r\u00e9conciliation<\/em>. 2015, version \u00e9lectronique, site web : www.trc.ca<\/a><\/p>\n

Coulthard, Glen. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition<\/em>. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
\nDunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne. An Indigenous People\u2019s History of the United States<\/em>, Beacon Press, Boston, 2014.
\nEscobar, Arturo, et Retrepo Eduardo. \u00ab Anthropologies h\u00e9g\u00e9moniques et colonialit\u00e9 \u00bb, Cahiers des Am\u00e9riques latines<\/em>, n\u00b0 62, 2009, p.83-95.
\nFabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object<\/em>. New York: Columbia UP, 2014.
\nGaudry, Adam, and Lorenz, Danielle. \u00ab Indigenization as inclusion, reconciliation, and decolonization: navigating the different visions for indigenizing the Canadian Academy \u00bb. AlterNative<\/em>, 14(3), 2018, p. 218-227.
\nKing, Thomas. The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America<\/em>. Anchor Canada, 2013.
\nLonetree, Amy. Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums<\/em>. Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina Press, 2012.
\nLoomba, Ania. Colonialism\/Postcolonialism<\/em>. 1998. London: Routledge (2nd ed.), 2005.
\nMadley, Benjamin. \u201cReexamining the American Genocide Debate: Meaning, Historiography, and New Methods\u201d, The American Historical Review<\/em>, vol. 120, n\u00b0 1, 2015, p. 98-139.
\nMenc\u00e9-Caster, Corinne, et C\u00e9cile Bertin-Elisabeth. \u00ab Approches de la pens\u00e9e d\u00e9coloniale \u00bb. Archip\u00e9lies<\/em>, 2018.
\nRifkin, Mark. \u00ab Settler Common Sense \u00bb. Settler Colonial Studies<\/em>, vol. 3, n\u00b0 3\u20134, 2013, p. 322\u201340.
\nSmith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies Research and Indigenous Peoples<\/em> [1999]. Londres : Zed Books, 2012 [2e<\/sup> \u00e9d.].
\nWagamese, Richard. Indian Horse.<\/em> Douglas & McIntyre, 2012.
\nWolfe, Patrick. \u201cSettler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native\u201d. Journal of Genocide Research<\/em>, vol. 8, n\u00b0 4, 2006, p. 387-409.<\/p>\n

Appel \u00e0 communication – Colloque \u00ab Pas de r\u00e9conciliation sans d\u00e9colonisation \u00bb MIMMOC Poitiers, mar s 2024.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Colloque international Pas de (r\u00e9)conciliation sans d\u00e9colonisation ? Dialogue(s) et dissonance(s) entre communaut\u00e9s autochtones, allochtones et autorit\u00e9s publiques en Am\u00e9rique […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[1545,1547,1544,1546,1542,1543],"class_list":["post-3372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cfp","tag-allochtones","tag-amerique-du-nord","tag-autochtones","tag-autorites","tag-decolonisation","tag-reconciliation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Admin","author_link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/author\/yanb\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Colloque international Pas de (r\u00e9)conciliation sans d\u00e9colonisation ? Dialogue(s) et dissonance(s) entre communaut\u00e9s autochtones, allochtones et autorit\u00e9s publiques en Am\u00e9rique […]","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3374,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372\/revisions\/3374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}