{"id":2278,"date":"2022-03-23T17:16:18","date_gmt":"2022-03-23T16:16:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/?p=2278"},"modified":"2022-03-23T17:16:18","modified_gmt":"2022-03-23T16:16:18","slug":"afealiste-aac-le-sud-des-etats-unis-au-coeur-des-enjeux-pol-itiques-americains-classe-race-et-espa-ces-au-prisme-de-l-oeuvre-de-michael-goldfield","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/cfp\/afealiste-aac-le-sud-des-etats-unis-au-coeur-des-enjeux-pol-itiques-americains-classe-race-et-espa-ces-au-prisme-de-l-oeuvre-de-michael-goldfield\/2278\/","title":{"rendered":"AFEAliste AAC – Le Sud des \u00c9tats-Unis au c\u0153ur des enjeux pol itiques am\u00e9ricains : classe, race et espa ces au prisme de l \u2019\u0153uvre de Michael Goldfield"},"content":{"rendered":"

[title\u00a0
\nLe Sud des \u00c9tats-Unis au c\u0153ur des enjeux politiques
\nam\u00e9ricains\u00a0: classe, race et espaces au prisme de l\u2019\u0153uvre de Michael
\nGoldfield<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

]<\/p>\n

Scroll down for English version<\/p>\n

Colloque international, organis\u00e9 par les\u00e9quipes IMAGER (UPEC) <\/strong>et CREW (Sorbonne Nouvelle), <\/strong>les 2-3 f\u00e9vrier 2023<\/strong><\/p>\n

L\u2019actualit\u00e9 aux \u00c9tats-Unis de ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es nous rappelle \u00e0 quel point le Sud s\u2019affirme \u00e0 la fois comme un lieu de particularismes et celui d\u2019un h\u00e9ritage commun, (qu\u2019il s\u2019agisse de l\u2019exp\u00e9rience d\u2019\u00c9tats anciennement esclavagistes ou du r\u00e9sultat de dynamiques politiques plus r\u00e9centes).<\/p>\n

Comme l\u2019\u00e9crit le politiste Michael Goldfield, \u00ab le Sud est une r\u00e9gion \u00e0 part et atypique des \u00c9tats-Unis. Mais c\u2019est aussi un miroir grossissant de l\u2019Am\u00e9rique, contradiction que j\u2019entends mettre en lumi\u00e8re \u00bb (Goldfield, 2020). Ces sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9s s\u2019inscrivent dans des structures sociales, culturelles, politiques et, suivant cet auteur, avant tout \u00e9conomiques, selon une imbrication qui rend toute d\u00e9finition du Sud probl\u00e9matique, comme l\u2019atteste la diversit\u00e9 des approches sur cette question (Odum, 1936 ; Kirby, 1983 ; Goldfield, 2020).<\/p>\n

Cependant, quelle que soit la mani\u00e8re dont le Sud est d\u00e9fini, il est certain que la vie politique \u00e9tatsunienne ne peut \u00eatre comprise si l\u2019on ne pr\u00eate pas attention \u00e0 la mani\u00e8re dont les rapports sociaux de classe et de race se nouent dans cet espace, en particulier \u00e0 des moments historiques d\u00e9cisifs mettant en jeu leur articulation ou leur mise en concurrence.<\/p>\n

Selon Michael Goldfield, la supr\u00e9matie blanche et les questions raciales se trouvent au c\u0153ur de tous les moments charni\u00e8res qui jalonnent l\u2019histoire politique des \u00c9tats-Unis : la p\u00e9riode coloniale ; la R\u00e9volution et la jeune R\u00e9publique ; la guerre de S\u00e9cession et la Reconstruction ; la d\u00e9faite du populisme et la consolidation d’un syst\u00e8me politique s\u00e9gr\u00e9gationniste et conservateur \u00e0 partir de 1896 (victoire de McKinley, l’arr\u00eat Plessy v. Ferguson<\/em>) ; la Grande D\u00e9pression et le New Deal ; le mouvement pour les droits civiques (Goldfield, 1997). \u00c0 l\u2019occasion de la sortie du dernier ouvrage de Michael Goldfield, The Southern Key<\/em>, en 2020, et en pr\u00e9sence de l\u2019auteur, nous proposons lors de ce colloque d\u2019aborder ces questions.<\/p>\n

Dans cet ouvrage, Goldfield s\u2019interroge tout particuli\u00e8rement sur les cons\u00e9quences de la crise \u00e9conomique des ann\u00e9es 1930 qui a donn\u00e9 naissance \u00e0 la version \u00e9tatsunienne de l\u2019\u00c9tat providence et \u00e0 un mouvement syndical de masse. Mais est-ce l\u2019av\u00e8nement du New Deal qui permit la vague de syndicalisation dans la grande industrie ou plut\u00f4t l\u2019inverse, comme l\u2019affirme Goldfield ?<\/p>\n

Les nouveaux rapports de force sociaux conduisirent le pr\u00e9sident Roosevelt \u00e0 construire une coalition politique large qui associait l\u2019aile gauche du Parti d\u00e9mocrate, des organisations syndicales, des groupes militants noirs, la majorit\u00e9 de la gauche marxiste, les socialistes et les humanistes chr\u00e9tiens. Cependant, les th\u00e8mes qui f\u00e9d\u00e9raient cette coalition \u2013 le combat contre les injustices sociales et raciales \u2013 ont fini par devenir des points d\u2019achoppement, par exemple lorsque l\u2019\u00e9chec de la syndicalisation du Sud a emp\u00each\u00e9 l\u2019extension des valeurs progressistes du New Deal \u00e0 l\u2019ensemble du pays et que le maccarthysme a mis \u00e0 mal la coalition rooseveltienne.<\/p>\n

\u00c0 diff\u00e9rents moments de l\u2019histoire des \u00c9tats-Unis, diverses tentatives de reconfiguration de ces rapports sociaux ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entreprises, par exemple lors des campagnes de syndicalisation du Sud par les syndicats industriels avant et apr\u00e8s la Seconde Guerre mondiale, ou lors des actions de l\u2019organisation \u00e9tudiante noire Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee \u00e0 partir de 1960.<\/p>\n

Ces p\u00e9riodes charni\u00e8res repr\u00e9sentent autant \u00ab d’occasions manqu\u00e9es \u00bb (Korstad, Lichtenstein, 1988 ; Griffin, Korstad, 1995 ; Korstad, 2008) qui auraient pu modifier le cours de l’histoire, ce que cherche \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer Goldfield dans une analyse contrefactuelle.<\/p>\n

Ce dernier propose notamment qu\u2019une syndicalisation plus interraciale du Sud, strat\u00e9gie abandonn\u00e9e par les directions syndicales, aurait pu changer la nature du mouvement des droits civiques en favorisant une alliance avec les ouvriers blancs.<\/p>\n

Plus largement, pour Michael Goldfield, \u00ab Les \u00e9checs (et r\u00e9ussites) dans la syndicalisation du Sud pendant les ann\u00e9es 1930 et 1940 (dont le succ\u00e8s aurait eu le potentiel de transformer radicalement le Sud, mais aussi le reste du pays) repr\u00e9sentent la cl\u00e9 privil\u00e9gi\u00e9e [golden key] <\/em>pour comprendre non seulement la trajectoire de la politique am\u00e9ricaine, mais aussi celle de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tasunienne contemporaine dans sa globalit\u00e9 \u00bb (Goldfield, 2020).<\/p>\n

Pour ce colloque, nous proposons trois angles d\u2019approche : l\u2019interaction entre race, classe et capital; la dimension spatiale de ces interactions ; les causes et la persistance du racisme aux \u00c9tats-Unis. Ces interrogations n\u00e9cessitent une r\u00e9flexion \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique sur les divers paradigmes explicatifs employ\u00e9s par les historien.nes, les sociologues, les politistes, ou les sp\u00e9cialistes d\u2019\u00e9tudes culturelles, dont les usages et les conclusions diff\u00e8rent.<\/p>\n

Les pr\u00e9sentations pourront aborder les th\u00e9matiques suivantes :<\/p>\n

\u25cf Les interactions, articulations et imbrications entre classe, race et capital et leurs enjeux: l\u2019articulation entre mouvements syndicaux, sociaux et \u00e9volutions politiques ou l\u00e9gislatives, aux \u00e9chelles f\u00e9d\u00e9rales et locales ; la mani\u00e8re dont ces mouvements ont tr\u00e8s souvent occult\u00e9 la question du genre et ignor\u00e9 les revendications f\u00e9ministes.<\/p>\n

\u25cf Mobilisations, militantisme, r\u00e9sistances, aussi bien du point de vue historique que sociologique : on pourra s\u2019int\u00e9resser aux mouvements organis\u00e9s et structur\u00e9s comme aux formes plus diffuses ou informelles, voire infrapolitiques, de r\u00e9sistance ou de r\u00e9bellion.<\/p>\n

\u25cf L\u2019influence des paradigmes \u00e9pist\u00e9mologiques utilis\u00e9s pour comprendre la signification du facteur racial et leurs limites et l\u2019heuristique de la causalit\u00e9 : approches mat\u00e9rialistes ; analyses intersectionnelles, socioculturelles ; s\u00e9gr\u00e9gation, d\u00e9s\u00e9gr\u00e9gation, re-s\u00e9gr\u00e9gation, entre autres questionnements.<\/p>\n

\u25cf (Re)d\u00e9finir \/ (Re)penser le Sud comme construction \u00e9conomique, politique, sociale, g\u00e9oculturelle et comme objet d\u2019\u00e9tude heuristique.<\/p>\n

\u25cf L\u2019analyse contrefactuelle au service d\u2019une histoire contemporaine des \u00c9tats-Unis. Les interpr\u00e9tations contrefactuelles (et leur l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 scientifique) soul\u00e8vent des d\u00e9bats int\u00e9ressants entre historien\u2027nes sur ce qui aurait pu se passer et peut-\u00eatre aussi sur ce que les acteurs envisageaient comme \u00e9tant possible \u00e0 l’\u00e9poque. Elles peuvent \u00e9galement servir de base \u00e0 une r\u00e9flexion portant sur des strat\u00e9gies politiques dans le contexte contemporain (par exemple la syndicalisation des travailleurs d\u2019Amazon), puisqu’une partie consid\u00e9rable de l’\u0153uvre de Michael Goldfield tend dans cette direction.<\/p>\n

Goldfield M., 2020, The Southern Key: Class, Race, and Radicalism in the 1930s and 1940s<\/em>, Oxford, Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Goldfield M., 1997, The Color of Politics: Race and the Mainsprings of American Politics<\/em>,New York, The New Press.<\/p>\n

Griffin L.J. et Korstad R.R., 1995, \u00ab Class as Race and Gender: Making and Breaking a Labor Union in the Jim Crow South \u00bb, Social Science History<\/em>, 19, 4, p. 425\u2011454.<\/p>\n

Kirby J.T., 1983, \u00ab The Southern Exodus, 1910-1960: A Primer for Historians \u00bb, The Journal of Southern History<\/em>, 49, 4, p. 585.<\/p>\n

Korstad R., 2008, \u00ab Civil Rights Unionism and the Black Freedom Struggle \u00bb, American Communist History<\/em>, 7, 2, p. 255\u2011258.<\/p>\n

Korstad R. et N. Lichtenstein, 1988, \u00ab Opportunities Found and Lost: Labor, Radicals, and the Early Civil Rights Movement \u00bb, The Journal of American History<\/em>, 75, 3, p. 786\u2011811.<\/p>\n

Odum H.W., 1936, Southern regions of the United States, by Howarp W. Odum, for the Southern regional committee of the Social science research council<\/em>, Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.<\/p>\n

Proc\u00e9dure de soumission : <\/strong><\/p>\n

Les propositions de communication feront jusqu\u2019\u00e0 500 mots et seront accompagn\u00e9es d\u2019une notice biographique. Les communications seront en fran\u00e7ais ou en anglais. Les propositions seront adress\u00e9es \u00e0 Donna Kesselman (dkessel11@gmail.com<\/a>) et James Cohen (<\/p>\n

Comit\u00e9 d\u2019Organisation :<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kalilou Barry<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Lyais Ben Youssef<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

James Cohen<\/strong>, Professeur, Sorbonne Nouvelle<\/p>\n

Esther Cyna<\/strong>, Docteure en histoire et Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Sorbonne Nouvelle-Columbia<\/p>\n

H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Le Dantec-Lowry<\/strong>, Professeure \u00e9m\u00e9rite, Sorbonne Nouvelle<\/p>\n

Mathieu Hocquelet<\/strong>, Chercheur en Sociologie du Travail, C\u00e9req<\/p>\n

Donna Kesselman<\/strong>, Professeure, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Olivier Maheo<\/strong>, Post-doctorant, UPL, Institut d’Histoire du Temps Pr\u00e9sent, CNRS-Paris 8<\/p>\n

Guillaume Marche<\/strong>, Professeur, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Cody Melcher<\/strong>, Assistant Professor of Sociology, Loyola University<\/p>\n

Marie M\u00e9nard<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Comit\u00e9 scientifique :<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mathieu Bonzom<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetre de Conf\u00e9rences en anglais\/\u00e9tudes nord-am\u00e9ricaines, Universit\u00e9 Paris 1 Panth\u00e9on-Sorbonne<\/p>\n

Audrey C\u00e9lestine<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetresse de Conf\u00e9rences, Universit\u00e9 de Lille<\/p>\n

C\u00e9cile Coquet-Mokoko<\/strong>, Professeure de Civilisation des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 Versailles-St Quentin<\/p>\n

Elizabeth Faue<\/strong>, Professor of History, Wayne State University<\/p>\n

Rosemary Feurer<\/strong>, Associate Professor of History, Northern Illinois University<\/p>\n

Errol A. Henderson<\/strong>, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University<\/p>\n

Ambre Ivol<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetresse de Conf\u00e9rences en Civilisation des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 de Nantes<\/p>\n

Emilien Julliard<\/strong>, Enseignant-Chercheur en Sociologie, Institut du Travail de Strasbourg<\/p>\n

Nelson Lichtenstein<\/strong>, Research Professor, Department of History, UC Santa Barbara<\/p>\n

H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Quanquin<\/strong>, Professeure de Civilisation des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 de Lille<\/p>\n

Caroline Rolland-Diamond<\/strong>, Professeure d\u2019histoire des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 Paris Nanterre<\/p>\n

Anne Stefani<\/strong>, Professeure en histoire et civilisation am\u00e9ricaines, Universit\u00e9 Toulouse-Jean Jaur\u00e8s<\/p>\n

Jean-Christian Vinel<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetre de Conf\u00e9rences HDR, Histoire am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 de Paris<\/p>\n

Karel Yon<\/strong>, Charg\u00e9 de Recherche en Sociologie, CNRS\/Universit\u00e9 Paris Nanterre<\/p>\n

English Version:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Class, Race and Place in the US South: American Politics through the Lens of Michael Goldfield\u2019s Work<\/strong><\/p>\n

International Conference, organized by IMAGER (Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil) and CREW (Sorbonne Nouvelle) research centers, 2-3 February 2023<\/strong><\/p>\n

Recent events in the United States remind us to what extent the South is both a place of distinctive identities and a space sharing a common heritage.<\/p>\n

According to the political scientist Michael Goldfield, \u201cThe South is a distinctive, atypical part of the United States; it is also, however, America writ large\u201d" (Goldfield, 2020). These specificities are inscribed in social, cultural, political and, according to the author, above all economic<\/em> structures, in a configuration that makes any definition of the \u201cSouth\u201d problematic (Odum, 1936; Kirby, 1983; Goldfield, 2020).<\/p>\n

Still, however the South is defined, the ways class and race relations intertwine in that space requires a close attention for one to understand American political life, especially at decisive historical moments, when their articulation or competition is at stake.<\/p>\n

According to Goldfield, white supremacy and issues of race are at the center of every critical turning point in American political history: the colonial era, the Revolutionary War and the Constitution, the Civil War and Reconstruction, the defeat of Populism and the System of 1896; the Great Depression and the New Deal; the civil rights movement (Goldfield, 1997). On the occasion of the release of Michael Goldfield\u2019s latest book, The Southern Key<\/em> (2020) we want to address these issues during an international symposium in the presence of the author.<\/p>\n

In this book, Goldfield specifically investigates the consequences of the 1930s economic crisis which gave birth to the American welfare state and a mass labor movement. But was it the advent of the New Deal that enabled a wave of industrial unionization, or rather the opposite, as Goldfield argues?<\/p>\n

The new balance of powers led President Roosevelt to build a large political coalition combining the left wing of the Democratic Party, unions, black activist groups, the majority of Marxist organizations, socialists, and Christian humanists. Nevertheless, if central themes like the fight for social and racial justice unified them, they soon became points of contention, as when the failure to unionize the South prevented the extension of the progressive values of the New Deal to the entire country.<\/p>\n

At different times in American history, various attempts to reconfigure these social structures were made, for instance during labor organizing campaigns in the South before and after WWII, or during Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee campaigns after 1960.<\/p>\n

These critical turning points constitute \u201cmissed opportunities\u201d (Korstad, Lichtenstein, 1988; Griffin, Korstad, 1995; Korstad, 2008) that could have changed the course of history, which Goldfield argues in a counterfactual analysis. In particular, Goldfield suggests that interracial unionization of the South, a strategy abandoned by union leadership, could have changed the nature of the civil rights movement by fostering an alliance with white workers.<\/p>\n

More widely, for Michael Goldfield, \u201cthe failure during the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s of organized labor to fully unionize the main Southern industries (whose successes, I will argue, would have had the potential to radically transform the South and, thus, the nation as a whole), a central factor in our understanding of America today\u201d (Goldfield, 2020).<\/p>\n

For this conference, we propose three different angles of approach: the interaction between race, class and capital; the spatial dimension of these interactions; the causes for and the perpetuation of racism in the United States. These themes require an epistemological reflection on the various explanatory paradigms employed by historians, sociologists, political scientists, or specialists in cultural studies, whose methodologies and conclusions differ.<\/p>\n

Presentations may approach the following themes:<\/p>\n

\u25cf Interactions, articulations and interweaving between class, race, and capital and their stakes; articulations between unions, social movements, and political or legislative evolution at the national or local scale; the way these movements have often overshadowed gender issues and ignored feminist demands.<\/p>\n

\u25cf Mobilization, activism and resistance from a historical or sociological point of view: organized and structured movements as well as more informal and diffuse forms of resistance or rebellion could be addressed.<\/p>\n

\u25cf The influence of epistemological paradigms used to understand the significance and the limits of racial factors and the heuristics of their causality: materialistic approaches; intersectional and sociocultural analyses; segregation, desegregation, re-segregation among other themes.<\/p>\n

\u25cf (Re)defining \/ (Re) thinking the South as an economic, political, social, and geo-cultural construction and as a heuristic object of study.<\/p>\n

\u25cf The study of the contemporary history of the United States with a counterfactual analysis. Counterfactual interpretations (and their scientific legitimacy) raise interesting debates between historians about what could have happened (and perhaps what the actors of this era envisioned as possible). It could also be an indirect way to formulate strategic propositions for today (which Michael Goldfields does while commenting on the contemporary events, for instance, with the unionization effort of Amazon workers in Bessemer, AL).<\/p>\n

Goldfield M., 2020, The Southern Key: Class, Race, and Radicalism in the 1930s and 1940s<\/em>, Oxford, Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Goldfield M., 1997, The Color of Politics: Race and the Mainsprings of American Politics<\/em>,New York, The New Press.<\/p>\n

Griffin L.J. et Korstad R.R., 1995, \u00ab Class as Race and Gender: Making and Breaking a Labor Union in the Jim Crow South \u00bb, Social Science History<\/em>, 19, 4, p. 425\u2011454.<\/p>\n

Kirby J.T., 1983, \u00ab The Southern Exodus, 1910-1960: A Primer for Historians \u00bb, The Journal of Southern History<\/em>, 49, 4, p. 585.<\/p>\n

Korstad R., 2008, \u00ab Civil Rights Unionism and the Black Freedom Struggle \u00bb, American Communist History<\/em>, 7, 2, p. 255\u2011258.<\/p>\n

Korstad R. et N. Lichtenstein, 1988, \u00ab Opportunities Found and Lost: Labor, Radicals, and the Early Civil Rights Movement \u00bb, The Journal of American History<\/em>, 75, 3, p. 786\u2011811.<\/p>\n

Odum H.W., 1936, Southern regions of the United States, by Howarp W. Odum, for the Southern regional committee of the Social science research council<\/em>, Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.<\/p>\n

Submission Procedure:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Proposals should be no longer than 500 words in length and be accompanied by a short biographical note. Papers will be in English or in French. They should be sent to Donna Kesselman (dkessel11@gmail.com<\/a>) and James Cohen (<\/p>\n

Organizing Committee: <\/strong><\/p>\n

Kalilou Barry<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Lyais Ben Youssef<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

James Cohen<\/strong>, Professeur, Sorbonne Nouvelle<\/p>\n

Esther Cyna<\/strong>, Docteure en histoire et Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Sorbonne Nouvelle-Columbia<\/p>\n

H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Le Dantec-Lowry<\/strong>, Professeure \u00e9m\u00e9rite, Sorbonne Nouvelle<\/p>\n

Mathieu Hocquelet<\/strong>, Chercheur en Sociologie du Travail, C\u00e9req<\/p>\n

Donna Kesselman<\/strong>, Professeure, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Olivier Maheo<\/strong>, Post-doctorant, UPL, Institut d’Histoire du Temps Pr\u00e9sent, CNRS-Paris 8<\/p>\n

Guillaume Marche<\/strong>, Professeur, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Cody Melcher<\/strong>, Assistant Professor of Sociology, Loyola University<\/p>\n

Marie M\u00e9nard<\/strong>, Doctorant en Civilisation am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil<\/p>\n

Scientific Committee:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mathieu Bonzom<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetre de Conf\u00e9rences en anglais\/\u00e9tudes nord-am\u00e9ricaines, Universit\u00e9 Paris 1 Panth\u00e9on-Sorbonne<\/p>\n

Audrey C\u00e9lestine<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetresse de Conf\u00e9rences, Universit\u00e9 de Lille<\/p>\n

C\u00e9cile Coquet-Mokoko<\/strong>, Professeure de Civilisation des Etats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 Versailles-St Quentin<\/p>\n

Elizabeth Faue<\/strong>, Professor of History, Wayne State University<\/p>\n

Rosemary Feurer<\/strong>, Associate Professor of History, Northern Illinois University<\/p>\n

Errol A. Henderson<\/strong>, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University<\/p>\n

Ambre Ivol<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetresse de Conf\u00e9rences en Civilisation des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 de Nantes<\/p>\n

Emilien Julliard<\/strong>, Enseignant-Chercheur en sociologie, Institut du Travail de Strasbourg<\/p>\n

Nelson Lichtenstein<\/strong>, Research Professor, Department of History, UC Santa Barbara<\/p>\n

H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Quanquin<\/strong>, Professeure de Civilisation des \u00c9tats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 de Lille<\/p>\n

Caroline Rolland-Diamond<\/strong>, Professeure d\u2019histoire des Etats-Unis, Universit\u00e9 Paris Nanterre<\/p>\n

Anne Stefani<\/strong>, Professeure en histoire et civilisation am\u00e9ricaines, Universit\u00e9 Toulouse-Jean Jaur\u00e8s<\/p>\n

Jean-Christian Vinel<\/strong>, Ma\u00eetre de Conf\u00e9rences HDR, Histoire am\u00e9ricaine, Universit\u00e9 de Paris<\/p>\n

Karel Yon<\/strong>, Charg\u00e9 de Recherche en Sociologie, CNRS\/Universit\u00e9 Paris Nanterre<\/p>\n

Donna Kesselman<\/p>\n

AAC CFP_final_Colloque Classe, race, espaces.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[title\u00a0 Le Sud des \u00c9tats-Unis au c\u0153ur des enjeux politiques am\u00e9ricains\u00a0: classe, race et espaces au prisme de l\u2019\u0153uvre de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cfp"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Admin","author_link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/author\/yanb\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"[title\u00a0 Le Sud des \u00c9tats-Unis au c\u0153ur des enjeux politiques am\u00e9ricains\u00a0: classe, race et espaces au prisme de l\u2019\u0153uvre de […]","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2278"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2278\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2280,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2278\/revisions\/2280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}