{"id":2014,"date":"2021-06-08T19:37:18","date_gmt":"2021-06-08T17:37:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/cfp\/raconter-exposer-et-commemorer-lhistoire-des-minorites-aux-etats-unis\/2014\/"},"modified":"2021-06-08T19:37:18","modified_gmt":"2021-06-08T17:37:18","slug":"raconter-exposer-et-commemorer-lhistoire-des-minorites-aux-etats-unis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/cfp\/raconter-exposer-et-commemorer-lhistoire-des-minorites-aux-etats-unis\/2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Raconter, exposer et comm\u00e9morer l\u2019histoire des minorit\u00e9s aux Etats-Unis."},"content":{"rendered":"

Bonjour \u00e0 tou.te.s<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nous avons le plaisir de vous transmettre un appel \u00e0 communication pour une journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude le vendredi 10 d\u00e9cembre 2021 \u00e0 l’IHTP, Institut d’Histoire du Temps Pr\u00e9sent, Campus Condorcet.<\/p>\n

Vous trouverez ci-dessous l’appel \u00e0 communication et les modalit\u00e9s de r\u00e9ponse (english below)<\/p>\n

le comit\u00e9 d’organisation : Olivier Maheo (IHTP), Pauline Peretz (IHTP), Sarah Frioux-Salgas (Mus\u00e9e du quai Branly \u2013 Jacques Chirac).<\/p>\n

Appel \u00e0 communication, journ\u00e9e d\u2019\u00e9tudes le 10 d\u00e9cembre 2021 (English version below)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Raconter, exposer et comm\u00e9morer l\u2019histoire des minorit\u00e9s aux Etats-Unis.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Les mus\u00e9es et sites historiques \u00e9tats-uniens et les r\u00e9cits minoritaires <\/strong><\/p>\n

Journ\u00e9e d\u2019\u00e9tude organis\u00e9e par l\u2019Institut d\u2019Histoire du Temps Pr\u00e9sent, UMR 8244, le vendredi 10 d\u00e9cembre 2021. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Les perspectives critiques ont particip\u00e9 au d\u00e9veloppement des recherches en histoire sur le fait minoritaire, qui peut \u00eatre approch\u00e9 de deux mani\u00e8res : d\u2019une part du point de vue de la domination qui s\u2019exerce, d\u2019autre part du point de vue des exp\u00e9riences des membres de la minorit\u00e9 (Chassain et al., 2016). Un colloque en sciences sociales posait ainsi la question de savoir si \u00ab L’histoire des minorit\u00e9s est une histoire marginale ? \u00bb (Laithier et al., 2008). Le terme polys\u00e9mique de \u00ab minorit\u00e9 \u00bb prend sur le sol \u00e9tatsunien le sens de minorit\u00e9s ethnoraciales, que lui a donn\u00e9 l\u2019histoire de son peuplement au travers des migrations successives de populations diverses. Il implique l\u2019inclusion dans un tout national, mais renvoie aussi \u00e0 un statut subalterne, \u00e9ventuellement cible de discriminations et d\u2019exclusions diverses. A c\u00f4t\u00e9 du roman national qui participe \u00e0 la construction d\u2019une \u00ab communaut\u00e9 imaginaire \u00bb, de multiples r\u00e9cits minoritaires subsistent, qu\u2019ils soient inclus comme un aspect du tout, ou bien qu\u2019ils proposent une histoire parall\u00e8le, voire oppos\u00e9e (Anderson, 1986). Le roman national n\u2019exclut pas n\u00e9cessairement les narrations minoritaires, mais il implique diff\u00e9rentes formes d\u2019exclusions et d\u2019oublis, dont Benedict Anderson a montr\u00e9 comment ils participaient de la construction d\u2019un \u00ab fratricide rassurant \u00bb (Anderson, 1986 ; Mylonas, 2013). Nous souhaitons interroger la mani\u00e8re dont diff\u00e9rentes minorit\u00e9s ont voulu int\u00e9grer leur histoire particuli\u00e8re au r\u00e9cit national, corriger ce dernier, le contester, voire s\u2019en s\u00e9parer en revendiquant la r\u00e9appropriation de son histoire autonome.<\/p>\n

Les r\u00e9cits minoritaires mobilisent des m\u00e9moires collectives sp\u00e9cifiques, des processus de patrimonialisation et diff\u00e9rentes m\u00e9diations de l\u2019histoire, notamment dans les cadres scolaires, m\u00e9diatiques. Nous proposons de nous concentrer sur une de leurs formes concr\u00e8tes, \u00e0 savoir les mus\u00e9es et les sites patrimoniaux. Ceux-ci sont en effet au centre d\u2019enjeux politiques et historiographiques dans la mani\u00e8re dont ils articulent, ou pas, le r\u00e9cit des minorit\u00e9s et le r\u00e9cit national. Les plus grands mus\u00e9es focalisent de ce point de vue l\u2019attention : \u00e0 Washington les mus\u00e9es prestigieux de la Smithsonian Institution se succ\u00e8dent sur le National Mall : National Museum of American History, National Museum of the American Indian, fond\u00e9 en 1989 et National Museum of African American History and Culture, ouvert en septembre 2016. Le 21 d\u00e9cembre 2020 le Congr\u00e8s vient de voter la Smithsonian Women\u2019s History Act qui autorise le lancement d\u2019un mus\u00e9e national des femmes, dont le projet remonte \u00e0 1998, et d\u2019un National Museum of the American Latino, propos\u00e9 lui d\u00e8s 1994. Ces institutions sont certes les plus visibles, mais elles ne doivent pas faire oublier des structures plus petites, dont les origines et les dynamiques peuvent \u00eatre des plus diverses.<\/p>\n

L\u2019\u00e9v\u00e9nement scientifique que nous vous soumettons propose d\u2019explorer ces questions sous diff\u00e9rents angles et par diff\u00e9rentes approches disciplinaires du champ des sciences sociales. La question de la m\u00e9diation de l\u2019histoire, ici abord\u00e9e par le prisme des institutions mus\u00e9ales et des sites patrimoniaux, de m\u00eame que l\u2019articulation entre pass\u00e9 et pr\u00e9sent, seront au centre de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement. Les pistes de recherche que nous proposons ci-dessous ne pr\u00e9tendent pas \u00e9puiser le sujet, et toutes les propositions de communication seront \u00e9tudi\u00e9es.<\/p>\n

– Nous souhaitons interroger les d\u00e9bats soulev\u00e9s autour des mus\u00e9es et des sites patrimoniaux am\u00e9ricains (r\u00e9pertori\u00e9s par exemple en tant que Parcs Nationaux), et \u00e9clairer la mani\u00e8re dont ces institutions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 l\u2019enjeu de batailles m\u00e9morielles, politiques, urbanistiques. C\u2019est le cas alors qu\u2019ils ne sont encore que des projets, comme lors de leur fondation ou par la suite lorsqu\u2019ils d\u00e9veloppent des politiques mus\u00e9ales et patrimoniales. Une d\u00e9marche qui interroge la relation de ces institutions avec les espaces dans lesquels ils s\u2019ins\u00e8rent est aussi envisageable, afin de prendre en compte la mani\u00e8re dont les m\u00e9moires collectives s\u2019inscrivent dans l\u2019espace. Ainsi la tradition des fresques (murals<\/em>) qui couvrent certains murs, particuli\u00e8rement dans les quartiers hispaniques peut aussi \u00eatre \u00e9voqu\u00e9e, alors que leurs th\u00e8mes sont tr\u00e8s souvent historico-politiques. A ce titre les jeux d\u2019\u00e9chelle et l\u2019articulation entre des lieux, des territoires et diff\u00e9rents espaces pourrait aussi \u00eatre une approche int\u00e9ressante.<\/p>\n

– Une attention particuli\u00e8re peut-\u00eatre apport\u00e9e aux discours d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s par ces institutions quant \u00e0 leurs objectifs, qu\u2019il s\u2019agisse de la volont\u00e9 affirm\u00e9e d\u2019int\u00e9grer le r\u00e9cit minoritaire au grand r\u00e9cit national, de le corriger, ou de le contester et de revendiquer la r\u00e9appropriation de sa propre histoire autonome. De m\u00eame les formes que prennent ces tentatives, que ce soit dans la politique de collection, dans les expositions propos\u00e9es ou dans la d\u00e9marche envers le public, peuvent \u00eatre \u00e9clair\u00e9es. Il est possible d\u2019interroger la fa\u00e7on dont la minorit\u00e9 est construite dans une repr\u00e9sentation m\u00e9morielle coh\u00e9rente, qui peut dans le m\u00eame temps faire l\u2019impasse sur les clivages sociaux, genr\u00e9s, spatiaux ou g\u00e9n\u00e9rationnels qui risqueraient de mettre en p\u00e9ril l\u2019affirmation du groupe minoritaire. La popularit\u00e9 des dispositifs qui proposent des reconstitutions historiques, avec acteurs en costumes, activit\u00e9s propos\u00e9es au public et sc\u00e8nes historiques jou\u00e9es peut aussi faire l\u2019objet d\u2019une r\u00e9flexion.<\/p>\n

– Il est enfin possible d\u2019interroger la diversit\u00e9 des formes de r\u00e9cits propos\u00e9s par ces mus\u00e9es, de leurs approches et de leurs collections. Certains, proposent une histoire polyphonique qui met l\u2019accent sur la multiplicit\u00e9 des r\u00e9cits, tel le Mus\u00e9e National de l\u2019Immigration d\u2019Ellis Island, tandis que d\u2019autres suivent un r\u00e9cit plus lin\u00e9aire, voire t\u00e9l\u00e9ologique tel le National Museum of American History. Ce mus\u00e9e a toutefois abrit\u00e9 en 1987 une exposition \u00e0 propos d\u2019un \u00e9pisode dramatique, l\u2019internement des japonais-am\u00e9ricains \u00e0 partir de 1942[1]<\/a>. Ailleurs certains sites historiques sont mis en valeur au travers d\u2019une mise en sc\u00e8ne, tel Harper\u2019s Ferry, aujourd\u2019hui en Virginie Occidentale, autour du coup de main militaire men\u00e9 par l\u2019abolitioniste radical John Brown en 1859. Une approche typologique peut \u00eatre envisag\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

Propositions<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nous encourageons les chercheur.se.s de diff\u00e9rents champs disciplinaires rattach\u00e9s aux sciences humaines et sociales (histoire, histoire de l\u2019art, civilisation, sociologie) \u00e0 soumettre des propositions pour des communications en fran\u00e7ais ou en anglais.<\/p>\n

Merci d\u2019adresser votre proposition (environ 500 mots), en anglais ou en fran\u00e7ais, \u00e9ventuellement accompagn\u00e9e d\u2019images, ainsi qu\u2019une br\u00e8ve biographie, pour le 15 septembre 2021 \u00e0 cette adresse : raconterlesminorites<\/p>\n

Nom, pr\u00e9nom, institution de rattachement, adresse mail, et une liste de mots cl\u00e9s<\/strong>. Vous pr\u00e9senterez la probl\u00e9matique en rapport avec le titre annonc\u00e9, l\u2019ancrage scientifique et conceptuel dans lequel vous vous situez et la m\u00e9thodologie adopt\u00e9e. Vous proposerez, apr\u00e8s le r\u00e9sum\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Calendrier<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date de soumission : 15 septembre 2021<\/p>\n

Notification de s\u00e9lection : 30 septembre 2021<\/p>\n

Date de la journ\u00e9e d\u2019\u00e9tude : Vendredi 10 d\u00e9cembre 2021<\/p>\n

Lieu : Campus Condorcet, \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser<\/p>\n

Comit\u00e9 organisateur<\/strong> : Olivier Maheo (IHTP), Pauline Peretz (IHTP), Sarah Frioux-Salgas (mus\u00e9e du quai Branly \u2013 Jacques Chirac).<\/strong><\/p>\n

Call for papers: workshop on the 12\/10\/2021<\/strong><\/p>\n

Telling, exhibiting and commemorating minority histories in the United States.<\/strong><\/p>\n

U.S. museums and historic sites, and minority narratives <\/strong><\/p>\n

Workshop organized by the Institut d\u2019Histoire du Temps Pr\u00e9sent, UMR 8244, to be held on the 12\/10\/2021<\/strong><\/p>\n

Critical perspectives have contributed to the development of research on minority histories, which can be approached in two ways: on the one hand from the point of view of the domination that is exercised, on the other hand from the point of view of the experiences of members of the minority (Chassain et al., 2016). Ten years ago, a social science symposium asked: "Is minority history a marginal history?" (Laithier et al., 2008). In the United States, the ambiguous term "minority" takes on the meaning of ethno-racial minorities, because of a history of successive wave of migrations from various continents. Being part of a minority implies the inclusion in a national entity, but also refers to a status, that may be discriminated against or excluded. Alongside the national myth, which participates in the construction of an "imagined community", multiple narratives exist, either included as an aspect of the national narrative, or proposing a parallel or even adverse history (Anderson, 1986). A national myth does not necessarily exclude minority narratives, but it does involve different forms of exclusion and forgetting, which have been shown by Benedict Anderson to contribute to the construction of a ‘reassuring fratricide\u2019 (Anderson, 1986; Mylonas, 2013). We would like to question the ways in which different minorities have sought to integrate their particular histories into the national narrative, to amend it, to contest it, or even to dissociate themselves by striving for the reappropriation of their autonomous history.<\/p>\n

Minority narratives mobilize collective memories and processes of patrimonialization and different mediations of history, notably in the school and medias. We propose to focus on one of their concrete forms, namely museums and heritage sites. Museums are indeed at the focus of political and historiographic issues in the way they articulate, or not, the narrative of minorities and the national narrative. The largest museums focus attention from this point of view: In Washington, D.C., the Smithsonian Institution’s prestigious museums are located on the National Mall: the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of the American Indian, founded in 1989, and the National Museum of African American History and Culture, opened in September 2016. On December 21, 2020, Congress passed the Smithsonian Women’s History Act, which authorized the establishment of a National Museum of Women, proposed in 1998, and a National Museum of the American Latino, proposed in 1994. These institutions are certainly the most visible, but they should not make us forget the smaller structures, whose origins and dynamics can be very diverse.<\/p>\n

In the framework of this workshop, we propose to explore these questions under different angles and considering different disciplinary approaches of the social sciences. The question of the mediation of history, here approached through the prism of museum institutions and heritage sites, as well as the articulation between past and present, will be our focus. Our research proposals do not claim to be exhaustive, and every proposal will be examined.<\/p>\n

– We wish to interrogate the debates raised around American museums and heritage sites (such as National Parks): these institutions have been the stake of memorial, political and urbanistic conflicts. This was the case when they were still projects, at the time of their foundation or later when they developed museum and heritage policies. It is also possible to question the relationship of these institutions with the spaces in which they are inserted, in order to take into account the inscription of collective memories in urban and rural space. Thus, the murals tradition, particularly in Hispanic neighborhoods, can also be considered. In this respect, the articulation of different levels and different places could also be pursued as a lign of inquiry.<\/p>\n

– Particular attention can be paid to discourses developed by these institutions as to their objectives, whether it is the willingness to integrate the minority narrative into the national narrative, to correct it, or to contest it and claim the reappropriation of its own history. Similarly, research could highlight collections and collecting policies, exhibitions and outreach programs. It is also possible to question the way in which the minority is constructed in a coherent representation, which can ignore the social, gendered, spatial or generational divides that could put the collective identity of the group at risk. The increasing popularity of historical re-enactments can also be examined.<\/p>\n

– Finally, one could also question the diversity of the forms of narratives proposed by these museums, their approaches and their collections. Some, such as the National Immigration Museum at Ellis Island, offer a polyphonic history that emphasizes multiple narratives, while others, such as the National Museum of American History, follow a more linear, even teleological narrative. However, in 1987, this museum hosted an exhibition about the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II[2]<\/a>. Elsewhere, certain sites are highlighted through a staging, such as Harper’s Ferry, today in West Virginia, around the military coup led by the radical abolitionist John Brown in 1859. A typological approach could be proposed.<\/p>\n

Proposals<\/strong><\/p>\n

We encourage researchers from all fields of the humanities and social sciences (history, art history, American studies, sociology, anthropology) to submit proposals for papers in English or French.<\/p>\n

Please send your proposal (500 words), in English or in French, possibly accompanied by images, as well as a brief CV, before the 15th of September 2021 to this address: raconterlesminorites<\/p>\n

Name, first name, institution of affiliation, e-mail address, and a list of key words<\/strong>. You will present the problematic in relation to the announced title, the scientific and conceptual background in which you are situated and the methodology adopted.<\/p>\n

Calendar<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of submission: 09\/15\/2021<\/p>\n

Notification of selection: 09\/30\/2021<\/p>\n

Study Day Date: 12\/10\/2021<\/p>\n

Organizing Committee: Olivier Maheo (IHTP), Pauline Peretz (IHTP), Sarah Frioux-Salgas (mus\u00e9e du quai Branly \u2013 Jacques Chirac).<\/strong><\/p>\n

R\u00e9f\u00e9rences\/References<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anderson B., 1986, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism<\/em>, Londres, Verso, 266 p.<\/p>\n

Chassain A. et al.<\/em>, 2016, \u00ab Approches exp\u00e9rientielles du fait minoritaire \u00bb, Trac\u00e9s. Revue de Sciences humaines<\/em>, 30, p. 7\u201126.<\/p>\n

Deutsch K.W. et Foltz W.J., 1963, Nation Building<\/em>, Atherton, CA, Atherton Press, 194 p.<\/p>\n

Elgenius G. et Aronsson P., 2014, National museums and nation-building in Europe 1750-2010: mobilization and legitimacy, continuity and change<\/em>, London, Routledge.<\/p>\n

Ferry M.A.H.F.N.H.P.N.P.S.P.B. 65 H. et Us W. 25425 P.-6029 C., Harpers Ferry National Historical Park (U.S. National Park Service)<\/em>, document en ligne, consult\u00e9 le 16 mars 2021 : https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/hafe\/index.htm<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Hobsbawm E. et Ranger T., 2012, The Invention of Tradition<\/em>, Cambridge University Press, 329 p.<\/p>\n

Ignatiev N., 2015, How the Irish Became White.<\/em>, Londres et New York, Routledge.<\/p>\n

Jones J.L., 1987, A more perfect union: Japanese americans and the United States constitution\u202f: a new exhibition at the National Museum of American History Smithsonian Institution October 1 1987.<\/em>, Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press.<\/p>\n

Laithier S. et al.<\/em> (\u00e9d.), 2008, L\u2019histoire des minorit\u00e9s est-elle une histoire marginale?<\/em>, Paris, PUPS, Presses de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Paris-Sorbonne.<\/p>\n

Mylonas H., 2013, The Politics of Nation-Building: Making Co-Nationals, Refugees, and Minorities<\/em>, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, coll. \u00ab Problems of International Politics \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Painter N.I., 2018, Histoire des blancs<\/em>, Paris, Max Milo.<\/p>\n

Quarles B., 2001, Allies for freedom: Blacks and John Brown<\/em>, Cambridge, Mass., Da Capo.<\/p>\n

Roediger D.R., 1999, The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class<\/em>, Verso, 220 p.<\/p>\n

Takaki R.T., 1993, A different mirror: a history of multicultural America<\/em>, Boston, Little Brown and Co, ix+508; 16 p.<\/p>\n

Thiesse A.-M., 2001, La cr\u00e9ation des identit\u00e9s nationales: Europe, XVIIIe-XXe si\u00e8cle<\/em>, Paris, Seuil, 330 p.<\/p>\n

Thiesse A.-M., 2010, \u00ab L\u2019Histoire de France en mus\u00e9e. \u00bb, Raisons politiques<\/em>, n\u00b0 37, 1, p. 103\u2011117.<\/p>\n

Thiesse A.-M., 2019, La fabrique de l\u2019\u00e9crivain national: entre litt\u00e9rature et politique<\/em>, Paris.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bonjour \u00e0 tou.te.s Nous avons le plaisir de vous transmettre un appel \u00e0 communication pour une journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude le vendredi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[116,401,400],"class_list":["post-2014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cfp","tag-history","tag-minorities","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Admin","author_link":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/author\/yanb\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Bonjour \u00e0 tou.te.s Nous avons le plaisir de vous transmettre un appel \u00e0 communication pour une journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude le vendredi […]","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afea.fr\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}